“There is only one way to endure vertigo: to surrender to it.
The moment one seeks a point of support, one collapses.
Vertigo is a temptation to fall, but also a temptation to rise.
It is the refusal of fixity, the nostalgia for an elsewhere where nothing stabilizes.
We are not made for standing upright, but for oscillation.
Vertigo reveals that our balance is only a momentary fiction.
What frightens us in it is not the fall, but the absence of ground.
For falling still implies a direction, an end.
Vertigo delivers us instead to a boundless infinity without bearings.
It is the experience of a space where up and down are abolished.
And that is why it attracts us as much as it repels us.
In vertigo, being comes undone from itself.
It discovers that it is not rooted, but suspended.
Suspended above nothing, or rather at the heart of an active nothing,
which works upon it and decomposes it.”
Emil Cioran, The Fall into Time
The word vertigo carries within it an oscillation: it names at once a very precise physical sensation and a much broader inner experience, almost metaphysical. Etymologically, vertigo comes from the Latin vertigo, derived from the verb vertere, to turn. This is not insignificant: before being a loss of balance, vertigo is first of all a movement, or more precisely a rotation. Something turns, the world, or oneself, and this rotation disturbs the stability of the relation between the body and space. Vertigo is therefore not immediately a fall: it is a disorientation born of an excess of movement or a lack of a fixed point.
In its primary sense, vertigo designates a disturbance of the vestibular system: the body can no longer reconcile what it perceives with what it feels. The eye says one thing, the inner ear another. There is a conflict. And this conflict produces a kind of involuntary fiction: the world seems to tilt, to sway, to slip away. What is stable becomes unstable, not in reality, but in lived experience. But very quickly, the word exceeds this physiological framework. Vertigo then becomes an experience of the limit.
It appears when the usual points of reference, spatial but also conceptual, cease to hold. Before an abyss, for example, vertigo is not only the fear of falling. As Søren Kierkegaard had already intuited, there is in vertigo a deeper ambiguity: it is not only the fear of the fall, but also the strange possibility of surrendering to it. Vertigo would thus be “the dizziness of freedom,” not the loss of control, but the sudden revelation that nothing holds us absolutely.
The void attracts as much as it frightens.
Here vertigo becomes a concept. It designates the experience of an excess—an excess of space, of depth, of possibilities, or even of meaning. Before the infinite… of the sea, the sky, or an idea… the mind falters because it can no longer contain what it encounters. There is too much to grasp, and nothing to hold on to. Vertigo is thus linked to a failure… what was meant to contain no longer contains.
In this sense, vertigo directly touches what the Moon Child explores: the question of the threshold.
The threshold, as long as it remains inhabitable, organizes passage. But when it opens without measure, when it no longer delimits but allows everything to flow in without restraint, it becomes vertiginous. Vertigo would then be a threshold without edge, a delimitation that comes undone at the very moment it should operate.
There is also a vertigo of time.
It appears in certain experiences of memory or thought: when the past returns not as an ordered recollection, but as an indistinct mass; or when the present seems to dilate to the point of losing its consistency. Once again, something “turns”: temporal bearings dissolve, and one no longer knows where or to what to hold.
Finally, there is a vertigo of language.
It arises when words cease to stabilize what they designate. When a sentence opens onto too many meanings at once, when an image exceeds all interpretation, a kind of rotation of meaning upon itself occurs. Language no longer fixes: it carries away. One no longer reads a text, one is taken into it.
Vertigo, in this sense, is not simply a loss. It is a limit-experience in which something is revealed: the absence of a stable ground, or more precisely the fact that the ground itself is in motion. It is not the world that wavers, but the claim to its fixity that falters.
Perhaps, then, vertigo is not the opposite of balance, but its hidden reverse: that which reminds us that balance is never given once and for all, that it is always in the process of being made, on the edge of its own disappearance.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire